Questões de Concurso - Questões e Provas de Concursos Públicos

Questões de Concurso
Inglês
Assunto - Análise sintática | Syntax Parsing

Filtrar (abrir filtros)

Salvar Filtros

limpar filtros limpar filtros

Clique em filtrar para atualizar

315 Questões de concurso encontradas

315 resultados
Página 1 de 63

Questões por página:

Concurso: Prefeitura de Teotônio Vilela - AL

Concurso: Prefeitura de Teotônio Vilela - AL
Cargo: Professor de Língua Inglesa
Ano: 2026

Ano:

2026

Banca:

IGEDUC

Cargo:

Professor de Língua Inglesa

Disciplina: Inglês

FC1328770

Dificuldade em análise

notificar erro

Notificar erro

Motivo:

Há um erro no enunciado e/ou alternativas

A resposta no gabarito oficial é outra

A disciplina ou assunto estão incorretos

A questão foi anulada

A questão está desatualizada

Informe mais detalhes

Erro de digitação ou português

As alternativas não aparecem

As imagens não aparecem

As imagens estão ilegíveis

Outro (especifique)

Alternativa A

Alternativa B

Alternativa C

Alternativa D

Alternativa E

Descrição

Acertou

Errou

adicionar questão na lista de favoritas

remover questão da lista de favoritas

Formal English allows subject–auxiliary inversion after certain negative or restrictive expressions placed at the beginning of a clause.

Select the CORRECT sentence.

(a)

Not until did the students submit the final draft they realised how much their argument had changed.

(b)

Not until the final draft was submitted the students realised how much their argument had changed.

(c)

Not until the final draft was submitted did the students realise how much their argument had changed.

(d)

Not until the students did submit the final draft had they realise how much their argument changed.

(e)

Not until the final draft had submitted did the students realised how much their argument had changed.

Concurso: Prefeitura de Teotônio Vilela - AL

Concurso: Prefeitura de Teotônio Vilela - AL
Cargo: Professor de Língua Inglesa
Ano: 2026

Ano:

2026

Banca:

IGEDUC

Cargo:

Professor de Língua Inglesa

Disciplina: Inglês

FC1328767

Dificuldade em análise

notificar erro

Notificar erro

Motivo:

Há um erro no enunciado e/ou alternativas

A resposta no gabarito oficial é outra

A disciplina ou assunto estão incorretos

A questão foi anulada

A questão está desatualizada

Informe mais detalhes

Erro de digitação ou português

As alternativas não aparecem

As imagens não aparecem

As imagens estão ilegíveis

Outro (especifique)

Alternativa A

Alternativa B

Alternativa C

Alternativa D

Alternativa E

Descrição

Acertou

Errou

adicionar questão na lista de favoritas

remover questão da lista de favoritas

mostrar texto associado esconder texto associado

O texto seguinte servirá de base para responder à questão.

Less job mobility, lower productivity: the cost of cosy capitalism

Australians are changing jobs far less often than they did 50 years ago. Financial insecurity, debt and workplace barriers may be trapping workers in jobs – and helping entrench a low-productivity form of "cosy capitalism".

Fifty years ago work was different, wasn't it? Your first job on leaving school was at the bottom of the hierarchy – filing, making coffee or cleaning up the building site. If all went well you would move through the ranks and retire from the same firm or government department having achieved a middle or senior rank. That was before there was a gig economy, before computers allowed people to set up their own microbusinesses, and before the word 'precariat' had been coined.

What a pity the ABS has challenged this myth with hard data in their annual series on Job Mobility. In the 1970s on average 17 per cent of workers changed their employer or business in any one year: now only 8 per cent of workers do. We're staying much longer in our jobs. This series, going back to 1972, is shown below.

The trend is clearly towards less mobility, interrupted by the occasional economic shock – the 'recession we had to have' in 1990, and the pandemic in 2020.

One might have expected that increased female participation in the workforce would have seen more mobility, but women have followed the same trend as men: after the mid-1980s the male and female lines are indistinguishable.

Tracing cause and effect would involve a large research task, but there are some plausible explanations.

One is that the workforce has become more professionalised. There are fewer short-term unskilled vacancies, and fewer workers lacking any post-school skills. Work has become a more serious commitment by both employees and employers.

Another is that the cost to the individual in changing jobs has increased. This requires some explanation, because it is not immediately obvious.

Over the last half century there has been a significant fall in personal savings. Fifty years ago we were saving about 15 to 20 per cent of household income. Now our savings are between 2 and 5 per cent of income. This is partly a statistical artefact, because we are now accumulating savings in compulsory superannuation. But in terms of liquidity, such as ability to tide oneself over between jobs, it is a real constraint. The ABS Making ends meet survey shows that 27 per cent of households would be unable to raise $2,000 for something important within a week. We are carrying more personal debt, not because we are spendthrifts, but because some debt, particularly student debt, has been forced upon us, and runaway housing prices have increased the burden of mortgage debt.

To illustrate this fall in savings, we note that the days of long strikes are well behind us. Now a one-day strike is newsworthy. In times past strikes could stretch out for weeks and no industry was immune: in 1973 Sydney's Kings Cross strippers went on strike for up to two months.

Some workers now are restricted in their mobility by non-compete clauses. Many workers realise that shifting to another job probably involves going through a probationary period, with an uncertain outcome. The associated risk of unemployment has to be weighed against the lower risk of continued employment in a comparatively secure but less satisfying job.

We have allowed our economy to evolve into what may be called a pattern of cosy capitalism, where businesses have a compliant and stable (if not necessarily content) workforce. It works for business not only in terms of power in the labour market, but also in the broader economy. Consumption is sustained by innovations such as buy-now-pay-later schemes, heightening dependence on regular pay. People with no cash in reserve depend on car loans and are unlikely to risk taking low-cost-high-deductible home and contents insurance. It's all very convenient for the finance sector.

Cosy capitalism is low-productivity capitalism, because it throttles the dynamics of capitalism. Workers become trapped in low-productivity jobs, and entrepreneurs trying to establish new businesses find it hard to attract labour. Existing firms have little incentive to boost labour productivity if they feel assured that they can hang on to workers in low-productivity jobs and don't have to increase their pay.

There are certain things governments can do to boost productivity that involve removing friction in the system. The government has committed to banning the unjustified use of non-compete clauses, for example. State governments could make it easier for people to move by abolishing real-estate transfer taxes and replacing them with land taxes. The Commonwealth could boost JobSeeker payments and remove some of the spend-down provisions in its asset test, shifting its design from a scheme of distributive welfare to one of income insurance. More could be done to allow for transfer of long service leave and sick leave between employers.

Such policies would boost productivity, but they wouldn't be met with many thanks from those who do well for themselves in our pattern of cosy capitalism. Business lobbies may speak for the short-term interests of existing business, but not for the interests of business in its wider sense. The distinction is important.

https://johnmenadue.com/post/2026/08/less-job-mobility-lower-productiv ity-the-cost-of-cosy-capitalism/

Consider the following excerpts:

"not because we are spendthrifts, but because some debt [...] has been forced upon us"

"those who do well for themselves"

"where businesses have a compliant and stable [...] workforce"

Select the CORRECT alternative.

(a)

Not because... but because... contrasts causal explanations; who introduces a relative clause; and where links a descriptive clause to the preceding economic pattern.

(b)

Not because... but because... presents cumulative causes; who functions as a demonstrative determiner; and where introduces concession.

(c)

Not because... but because... coordinates two temporal clauses; who functions interrogatively; and where introduces a direct question.

(d)

Not because... but because... establishes condition; who introduces reported speech; and where functions as a preposition governing businesses.

(e)

Not because... but because... expresses chronological sequence; who replaces an article; and where functions as a coordinating conjunction.

Concurso: Prefeitura de Teotônio Vilela - AL

Concurso: Prefeitura de Teotônio Vilela - AL
Cargo: Professor de Língua Inglesa
Ano: 2026

Ano:

2026

Banca:

IGEDUC

Cargo:

Professor de Língua Inglesa

Disciplina: Inglês

FC1328765

Dificuldade em análise

notificar erro

Notificar erro

Motivo:

Há um erro no enunciado e/ou alternativas

A resposta no gabarito oficial é outra

A disciplina ou assunto estão incorretos

A questão foi anulada

A questão está desatualizada

Informe mais detalhes

Erro de digitação ou português

As alternativas não aparecem

As imagens não aparecem

As imagens estão ilegíveis

Outro (especifique)

Alternativa A

Alternativa B

Alternativa C

Alternativa D

Alternativa E

Descrição

Acertou

Errou

adicionar questão na lista de favoritas

remover questão da lista de favoritas

mostrar texto associado esconder texto associado

O texto seguinte servirá de base para responder à questão.

Less job mobility, lower productivity: the cost of cosy capitalism

The trend is clearly towards less mobility, interrupted by the occasional economic shock – the 'recession we had to have' in 1990, and the pandemic in 2020.

Tracing cause and effect would involve a large research task, but there are some plausible explanations.

Another is that the cost to the individual in changing jobs has increased. This requires some explanation, because it is not immediately obvious.

https://johnmenadue.com/post/2026/08/less-job-mobility-lower-productiv ity-the-cost-of-cosy-capitalism/

Consider the following excerpt:

"People with no cash in reserve depend on car loans and are unlikely to risk taking low-cost-high-deductible home and contents insurance."

The sentence contains several structures that contribute to syntactic compression.

Select the CORRECT grammatical analysis.

(a)

With no cash in reserve functions as the direct object of people, while taking directly modifies the compound noun that follows.

(b)

With no cash in reserve constitutes a finite relative clause, while risk and taking form two coordinated finite verbs.

(c)

With no cash in reserve is an independent clause, while to risk taking functions as a nominal subject of the sentence.

(d)

With no cash in reserve postmodifies people, while to risk is an infinitival complement and taking functions as the complement of risk.

(e)

With no cash in reserve functions as an adverbial of depend, while taking introduces a temporal subordinate clause.

Concurso: UENP

Concurso: UENP
Cargo: Língua Inglesa
Ano: 2026

Ano:

2026

Banca:

OBJETIVA

Cargo:

Língua Inglesa

Disciplina: Inglês

FC1327162

Dificuldade em análise

notificar erro

Notificar erro

Motivo:

Há um erro no enunciado e/ou alternativas

A resposta no gabarito oficial é outra

A disciplina ou assunto estão incorretos

A questão foi anulada

A questão está desatualizada

Informe mais detalhes

Erro de digitação ou português

As alternativas não aparecem

As imagens não aparecem

As imagens estão ilegíveis

Outro (especifique)

Alternativa A

Alternativa B

Alternativa C

Alternativa D

Alternativa E

Descrição

Acertou

Errou

adicionar questão na lista de favoritas

remover questão da lista de favoritas

mostrar texto associado esconder texto associado

Which Sleep Profile Are You? The Answer Shapes Your Health

A night of solid rest can feel like a panacea. The quantity and quality of our sleep influence our physical health, our moods, our cognition and our ability to function in almost every aspect of life. Sleep can’t be reduced to a simple binary; researchers are finding it’s more complicated.

In a recent study, scientists analyzed brain scans and data on how shuteye affects many different measures of health. The dataset is based on self-reports from 770 healthy young adults. The researchers used statistical analysis to show that the complex relation between sleep and health can be _________ to five different profiles that describe how certain patterns of sleep are associated with changes in various aspects of our lives.

The profiles point to ways to improve sleep and health. Taking sleeping pills may _________ your memory, for instance, but could benefit your social relationships. And sleeping for at least six to seven hours a night might boost your cognitive performance and _________ your aggression. Sleep is individual, but you can improve it by keeping a regular bedtime, following a routine, and avoiding alcohol before bed.

Fonte: Scientific American. Adaptado.

Select the sentence that has the same grammatical structure as the one that predominantly appears in the poem.
Goodnight, Sweetheart, Goodnight
“Goodnight, Sweetheart, goodnight The stars are shining bright, The snow is turning white, Dim is the failing light, Fast falls the glooming night, All right! Sleep tight! Goodnight.” — Mark Twain

(a)

He enjoys cooking.