Questões de Concurso - Questões e Provas de Concursos Públicos

Concurso: Instituto Rio Branco

Concurso: Instituto Rio Branco
Cargo: Diplomata
Ano: 2025

Ano:

2025

Banca:

Cebraspe (cespe)

Cargo:

Diplomata

Disciplina: Inglês

FC482219

Dificuldade em análise

notificar erro

Notificar erro

Motivo:

Há um erro no enunciado e/ou alternativas

A resposta no gabarito oficial é outra

A disciplina ou assunto estão incorretos

A questão foi anulada

A questão está desatualizada

Informe mais detalhes

Erro de digitação ou português

As alternativas não aparecem

As imagens não aparecem

As imagens estão ilegíveis

Outro (especifique)

Certo

Errado

Descrição

Acertou

Errou

adicionar questão na lista de favoritas

remover questão da lista de favoritas

mostrar texto associado esconder texto associado

Diplomacy is often described as an art, involving decisions shaped by sensitive political nuances that require human judgment, cultural understanding, and emotional intelligence — qualities that AI cannot fully replicate. While AI can support decision-making, it may also manipulate human behavior subtly, especially through systems developed in countries with different geopolitical priorities. This deepens the AI divide between technologically advanced and resource-limited nations, embedding linguistic and cultural biases and reinforcing global power asymmetries. As algorithms take their place alongside diplomats, the art of negotiation now meets the science of AI. The future of diplomacy must lie in fostering a symbiotic relationship where AI enhances human expertise, streamlines processes, and offers new strategic tools while leaving the nuanced art of diplomacy in human hands.

Diplomatic institutions adopting such technologies should also adopt guardrails to clarify how these systems inform decision-making. To ensure that AI systems function appropriately across diverse cultural contexts, adaptive and responsible AI frameworks should be integrated into policy discussions at the national and international levels. Crucially, any AI deployment must prioritise human agency. The goal must not be to automate diplomacy, but to augment it. AI’s incorporation into diplomacy offers both promise and peril. While the technology supports efficiency and expands access to information, it must be governed by strong ethical frameworks, particularly when it can shape global power relations through sensitive negotiations. Rather than embracing AI as a magic wand, it must be approached as a double-edged sword that is capable of assisting, but never replacing the unique human skills that diplomacy demands.

Anusha Guru. The Future of Diplomacy: AI’s Expanding Role in International Affairs.

In: Observer Research Foundation,18/6/2025. Internet:<www.orfonline.org> (adapted).

Judge the following item based on the ideas presented in the preceding text, as well as on its linguistic aspects.

In the fragment “adaptive and responsible AI frameworks, ” (second sentence of the second paragraph), the words “adaptive” and “responsible” modify the expression “AI”.

- Certo - Errado

Filtrar (abrir filtros)

94 Questões de concurso encontradas 94 resultados Página 1 de 19 Questões por página: 5 10 15 20

94 Questões de concurso encontradas

94 resultados
Página 1 de 19

Questões por página: