Leia o texto para responder à questão.
It has been common in second language teaching to
stress the role of interference – that is, the interfering effects
of the native language on the target (the second) language.
It is of course not surprising that this process has been so
singled out, for native language interference is surely the
most immediately noticeable source of error among second
language learners. The saliency of interference has been
so strong that some have viewed second language learning
as exclusively involving the overcoming of the effects of the
native language. It is clear from learning theory that a person
will use whatever previous experience he or she has had with
language to facilitate the second language learning process.
The native language is an obvious set of prior experiences.
For example, a French native speaker might say in English, “I
am in New York since January,” a perfectly logical transfer of
the comparable French sentence “Je suis a New York depuis
Janvier.” Because of the negative transfer of the French verb
form to English, the French system has, in this case, interfered
with the person’s production of a correct English form.
(Brown, D. 1994. Principles of Language
Learning and Teaching. Adaptado)
Examples of non-referential pronoun it (a pronoun that
does not have a referent) used in the text are:
•? It has been common in second language…
•? It is of course not surprising…
•? It is clear from learning theory…
The word “it” in bold is a non-referential pronoun in
alternative: